At $200, you might as well add lidar. At $50,000 vision only made more sense.
A trained marksman may be able to hit a clay pigeon with a 22, but it's easier with a shotgun.
So saying a human can do something doesn't mean it's the easiest way.
It will be logic and driving behavior that makes the difference between Waymo/Tesla/others rather than whether the perception accuracy is micron level or not.
Tesla also has a robotaxi service in Dallas, FWIW, in testing.
Uber does 1 billion, for reference.
There's still a long, long way to go. Waymo has proven it can operate a high-priced service in a handful of cities in good weather, it hasn't yet demonstrated true scale and affordability.
Jokes aside I always thought this was a crap argument. If you can get more useful signals into a system, it's likely to perform better. Duh!
But never argue with a CEO: their interest is profit, not honest conversations.