It will if the benchmark is proprietary. If you can't train on it, then it's extremely difficult to game, and if it's hard enough, then it's economically more efficient to just...make the model smarter
It will if the benchmark is proprietary. If you can't train on it, then it's extremely difficult to game, and if it's hard enough, then it's economically more efficient to just...make the model smarter
The only solid way to reduce gaming the benchmarks is to ensure they're always, always changing. Enough pelicans on bicycles, start asking for turtles piloting gliders, or rabbits pushing skateboards. Broaden the focus, not narrow it into repetitive measures.
Please explain how, if I'm OpenAI and I'm making ChatGPT 5.7, and I release it, and Artificial Analysis goes off and runs one of their proprietary benchmarks on it from a random account, how I can optimize for that benchmark.
And it also is completely irrelevant to my challenge to show how proprietary benchmarking can be gamed, because it presumes (absolutely insane and divorced from reality) circumstances that have nothing to do with benchmarking as a concept or process.