Local politicians and commissioners also seem to be poorly suited to understanding the impact of data centers on their surrounding environs, being lured (as usual) by overly optimistic estimates of jobs and revenues.
> which has devolved into a non-specific cause-of-the-day for stay-at-home moms to complain about
This is a deeply uncharitable interpretation of people speaking up when there isn't anyone else speaking up for them.
Not at all. I'm saying that there are competing interests in placing these projects, and the people speaking up against them are making their interests heard. Municipal commissioners / planners also may not have experience with this kind of project, or underestimate issues that can be caused.
Take for example this: https://denverite.com/2026/07/21/denver-data-center-noise-co...
The DC has 14 diesel generators to supply 18 megawatts of power. That level of noise and combustion exhaust is utterly unsuitable for residential zoning, and yet that's what has happened.
Here's another example, with similar details: https://wjla.com/news/local/data-center-noise-fumes-create-f...
These people (and the others in the class action lawsuits and other news articles that are easy to find with a simple search) are NOT merely a "non-specific cause-of-the-day for stay-at-home moms to complain about". There are genuine complaints due to a failure to properly site the DCs.
Try talking IRL with what people dislike about datacenters. You might be surprised.