I suspect you will not accept this (because you have been manipulated by the generator?) but there is no "I" in repeated inference calls to large language models. There is no coherent entity behind the text. Try switching backend APIs mid-session, flip from Claude to Gemini and then to ChatGPT and the output will happily burble onwards "Oops, you're right, I see my last answer contained an error..."

It's lying to users just as much as an email autoreply that pretended to be a human response is lying.

Recommended reading: https://transformer-circuits.pub/2025/attribution-graphs/bio...