How credible is this credible claim?
Is it Acutus Medical, a “cardiac arrhythmia management company”, or Acutus Partners, “Expert healthcare consulting for transformative growth strategies that empower healthcare organizations to thrive and succeed”?
Neither seem obviously correct, and there are no other good candidates, not to mention that the lack of a link from “The Wire” to its supposed parent is suspicious.
Interesting test to the modern marketing theory that something needs a website to be real and tangible these days.
Its certainly worth following up on. Its cool and good to know who is paying someone.
But like, running a news site seems like something everyone is welcome to try and fail at?
My only concern is the idea that AI text has magical properties that can be tested and verified with 99% accuracy.
But indeed, if Pangram is marketing itself as "near-zero false-positives" now, that entails that the are aggressively biasing it towards being conservative, likely leading to lots of false-negatives and low match scores on AI content.