People don’t care means if every poster were labeled “AI generated” with a black banner at the bottom, people wouldn’t care.
Most can’t _recognize_ GPT & Gemini posters.
Good point on preview of feature.
Most can’t _recognize_ GPT & Gemini posters.
Good point on preview of feature.
Do you have evidence that people would care?
The specific case of this poster it appears they are claiming it was disclosed by the submitter that it was AI and still picked. Maybe that's diffusing the situation after, but it seems most likely these people selected and asked to care about the poster knew it was AI and still selected it. Most people would care less than they did.
The fact that a clearly sloptacular image won first place seems to corroborate that indeed people do like it. Until people's tastes change and they learn to recognize and immunize themselves against slop, the models will continue to generate it.
Just defend the original subject on its own merits.
-
I didn't mind the Thomas Kinkade reference, but you do have me thinking about to what extent analogies are lazy. Do you abstain from using them completely, or keep them rare?
Hyper-detailed but somehow off, intense colors, not entirely realistic as a complete scene but a combination of realistic scenes.
Wouldn't it be interesting if we could take this image back to ourselves in 2021 and see how we thought about it? I'm not a visual artist, so I would not have been overly critical of it. Today, AI art has a ton of baggage & as a result, the sloptacular is bothersome to me. But before I could recognize it, before certain styles became played out… probably much less offensive.
Will the generators keep up and become dynamic enough the immunization will never happen at scale?