[flagged]
Given the timing - you wouldn't be the one who flagged all those comments, would you?
https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong...
The vaccine now includes myocarditis as a known risks.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availabi...
Causing the stocks to slide when the link was made
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/vaccine-stocks-slide-...
With the mechanism probably understood now
https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/12/myocarditis-v...
Is the risk severe? No. But nothing that I saw removed suggested it was so, just higher in young men.
The risk ended up being real, but they removed studies from universities and articles from hospitals/doctors, based on vibes from an administration, rather than science
https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong...
I was especially interested in it all because I lost significant use of my arm for 2 months after a too-deep injection. The concept of incorrect injections, like into the blood stream (an untested/unapproved method, prevented by aspiration which was not done/prevented, as policy), was interesting to me, which also was all removed.
Here's a study you probably won't read because science is somehow political these days. Hint: the numbers are a rounding error given 10MM doses. Myocarditis following COVID‐19 vaccine https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9538893/