Well 8%-10% saving without measured quality degradation is not nothing, specially now that newer models seem to use more tokens than previous ones.
Also it was tested on reasoning low, i'd have liked to have them tested on higher reasoning levels.
Also it was tested on reasoning low, i'd have liked to have them tested on higher reasoning levels.
Grammar sounds off? Was the message correctly understood; is there enough left to apply error correction and regenerate the intended message?