>but whenever something expresses its right to do or not do

The problem (or the virtue?) of this comment is that it's impossible to decipher with which side it disagrees, and for what reason too. Cause both sides expressed their right to do or not to do.

> They aren't obligated to do any of that; they own the platform.

> Play ball or get out.

People can say things on their way out, and this is what's happening.

They don’t pay tax, right? Correct me if I’m wrong. It’s definitely a different (and public) conversation when things are claimed done for the public benefit and thus exempt from tax.

At least in the US tax-exempt status carries obligations.