You could live with your parents, or couchsurf with an understanding friend / partner. Richard Stallman famously lived out of his MIT office for a long period of time.
Of course, these lifestyles all have costs, just not necessarily financial ones.
Of course, these lifestyles all have costs, just not necessarily financial ones.
If you do plan to have kids, where are you going to house them? Okay, so they're going to share the RV with you. Do you plan to home-school them? Do you have time? Okay, maybe take advantage of the public system then. Whoops, you need a permanent address for that. I guess you're going private. Hope you saved up.
Unless you are RMS, you know, or otherwise really, really difficult to replace, the boss is unlikely to let you 'establish residence' in your office. The tax implications alone are complex. insurance, housing law, zoning law, man, it's a pain in the ass. I mean, I always was /that guy/ and I was a little annoyed the boss wouldn't let me live in the office, but now that I am the boss? I see why. It's cheaper to buy a cheap apartment than to deal with the bullshit.
that said, if I was single, I'd probably get a nice live-work place and let the chips fall where they may come audit time, just 'cause I think it'd be really cool and because some of those issues (like the 'establishing a residence' - you really don't want to have to call the sheriff and go through evictions when you fire the guy.) go away if the owner is the employee, too. but as I'm not single, yeah, having that separation of space (and having "my space") is pretty nice, too.
False, at least in NJ.
> For instance, the commissioner of education found that year-long residency in a local campground in violation of zoning laws had no impact on the determination of domicile under New Jersey’s school residency law. It is therefore unlawful for a school board to deny admission to a student on the basis of the legal status or physical condition of his or her home.
http://www.edlawcenter.org/assets/files/pdfs/publications/Re...
Secondly, there's no need to be negative in your reply. Some people might have different goals than you and it's not very kind to disparage them for that. There are people that don't continue their genetic lineage and have fulfilling lives. Perhaps you're just exaggerating to make a point, or the humor didn't quite convey over text and I'm just taking it too literally, but I don't see what you're trying to achieve with that harshness.