As for the rest of your comment, thank you for giving your point of view. Although I don't agree, I appreciate that you took the time to explain how you came to your position.
Cheers.
As for the rest of your comment, thank you for giving your point of view. Although I don't agree, I appreciate that you took the time to explain how you came to your position.
Cheers.
Everybody needs a security-hardened phone. Apple has been hardening iPhone for almost 20 years. Google has hardened Pixel from the start. This isn't specifically about GrapheneOS. Everybody should be worried, this is the kind of narrative is what drives Chat Control, etc. Security hardening (in reality) protects us against malicious apps, attackers, (to some extend) against privacy-invading apps, etc.
So, I ask you: what is the point of raising pedophiles in more than one interview when talking about security hardening?
By the way, I don't expect an answer. It's a rhetorical question. This discussion has been beaten to death. I think at this point we have to agree to disagree.