Hacker News Reader

Comment by neuroticnews25 | Hacker News Reader

Admittedly I don't have much life wisdom, but my strong intuition is happiness is a measure, not a target, and you shouldn't optimize for it. All this "science of happiness" talk feels, I don't know, spiritually offputting.

View on HN

We're closed loop systems, and happiness (momentary, long-term, + variants) are guidance signals from evolution. You don't have to optimize for it, but it's worth understanding the dozen or so real signals that "happiness" as a concept masks.

I believe that living a happy life is a long term survival strategy. Producing offsprings is the other way. If we feel miserable, we want to cut our life short or it will be due to many problems, bad health included. Long term happiness is a very good measure of how good your life is going. So while we might not agree on whether we should optimize our lives for happiness, it's certainly an objective we should always consider. However, we should not confuse happiness with pleasure. One is meant for the long term, while the other is ephemeral.

You are on a sphere with linear sun input, energy is limited, life is not limuited, the exponential hockeystick eats the sun, missery is unavoidable and built into all things.

Why exactly should someone acknowledge their unhappiness but then do nothing about it?

Because we have a limited amount of time and energy and other things might be more valuable to us. tbh, even this list kind of leans toward improving other measures as a means of increasing happiness. You could just write the article as "things to improve in your life", and then at the end go "oh yeah, and you'll probably be a bit happier too".

> even this list kind of leans toward improving other measures as a means of increasing happiness

Since we don't have direct access to happiness dial, every advice for increasing happiness is going to be like that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com