>Mullvad discusses its ideals of “a free and open society,”
A free and open society does not mean that law and order cannot exist. Nor does it mean that immigration laws cannot be created or enforced.
A free and open society does not mean that law and order cannot exist. Nor does it mean that immigration laws cannot be created or enforced.
I do not consider that as a requirement free society. While representational democracies give governance to a small amount of people compared to the overall populace theoretical you could have a society where everyone was on equal footing and all contributed to decisions being made.
However, support for migration is not a left or right issue. Accepting refugees might be (and I fully support that), but non-refugee immigration (the vast majority of it) is not an unalloyed good.
Immigration has a number of negative effects, on housing, employment and wages, inequalities, social cohesion, political direction.
Being a radical leftist and against immigration is not contradictory.