But they are not claiming that current models are better than humans but later developments might.
Do you think that a descendant of a fish could be a playwright or put on a play?
Do you think that a descendant of a fish could be a playwright or put on a play?
However there is a major flaw in your logic. Fishes (or their descendants) reciting Shakespeare is part of natural history. AI making quality music videos is just a prediction (or maybe even just wishful thinking). The former has occurred and has been observed, the later has not. So you are comparing nature with science fiction.
I believe that was the point.