From my vantage, this appears to be a "rules for thee but not for me" situation. If you support filming in public spaces, but believe restricting that to only those you trust, then this is hypocrisy.
From my vantage, this appears to be a "rules for thee but not for me" situation. If you support filming in public spaces, but believe restricting that to only those you trust, then this is hypocrisy.
I’m comfortable with armed security at an airport. I’m less comfortable at a supermarket.
absolute rules only hold in math. in life, almost everything is a matter of degree and of details. that doesnt make it hypocrisy
Children have different labor restrictions than adults.
Police have different gun access than civilians.
Businesses pay a different set of taxes than individuals.
And allowing businesses to do camera surveillance when you enter their property is in no way the same as allowing everyone to videotape each other at all times covertly and without consent. I really can't understand what process of reasoning could even get you there, besides "equal rights absolutism," which makes no sense.
How did you arrive at this statement from "We need equal rights, ones that exist for everyone, i.e. constitutional rights"? Seems like you're making an appeal to extremes.