It's Apache 2.0. You can have your agents audit it if you want.
What does this release have to do with "trusting" XAI?
What does this release have to do with "trusting" XAI?
curl -fsSL https://x.ai/cli/install.sh | bash
It has nothing to do with XAI, other than maybe not enforcing good practice (which most devs don't follow anyway).
``` curl -fsSL https://x.ai/cli/install.sh | \ llm -s "Review this shell script and tell me what it does" ```
That isn't unauditable trust...
Second, can you guarantee that an AI company can’t use its AI to hide malicious code from AI audits. Who if not an AI company could have such an expertise?
I don’t trust a company that pollutes the air of other people with illegal gas turbines because it shows the value their profit over people‘s health
Any evidence for this conspiracy theory? It's not on anyone to disprove this claim.
> it shows the value their profit over people‘s health
Companies are chartered to make their shareholders value. To a first approximation, it's illegal for a company to "fuckit, we care about people's health" unless this is what the shareholders voted for (as opposed to making their shares valuable).
You can argue this is bad, but it isn't about XAI, it applies to every company you've heard of.
If you have a record it’s on you to justify why I should trust you
> unless this is what the shareholders voted for
You do realize that for SpaceX the Musk has 85% of the voting power?
https://www.tradingkey.com/analysis/stocks/us-stocks/2619195...
And not every company I ever heard of installed gas turbines without permission that pollute the air for citizens.
Every company could act in bad faith but only domestic actually do and SpaceX is one of them.
Maybe you should try to explain those residents whose air is polluted that other companies are bad too. I‘m sure that relieves them.
And who said it need to be new concerns? Are the old ones resolved and are they not enough?