What exactly is your complaint with it?
`auto&&` has been standard syntax in C++ for going on 15 years now and has a very clear, irreplaceable meaning - a type-deduced forward reference - to any remotely competent developer.
`auto&&` has been standard syntax in C++ for going on 15 years now and has a very clear, irreplaceable meaning - a type-deduced forward reference - to any remotely competent developer.
for<template> [auto&&&&]:::static (std::for_enumeration_initializer &&⁢ @auto: {{const signed&&&&& i const}}) { }