Hacker News Reader

But even the dates they’re pointing to as evidence of fuzzing in that post pre-date Andrew Kelley’s accusation that they weren’t fuzzing.

When it gets to the point of having to click HN links to other HN posts which link to a reply in a thread on Mastodon which is splitting hairs over dates that are still prior to the accusation, you’ve lost me.

At best it seems like a more accurate outcome would be to update the original blog post with an edit saying that he meant they only started fuzzing recently and acknowledging the PR from 8 months ago?

I am struggling to even understand what are they trying to achieve? Or do they need a dozens of lessons on basic PR. Especially this is coming from VP of community.

As of this moment, even with all the new evidence being provided on Bluesky / mastodon, it doesn't amount to anything.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com