Hacker News Reader

Comment by titularcomment | Hacker News Reader

OpenBSD is the Linux of a decade or two ago, not attracting attention and not being compatible or useful for quite a lot of stuff.

View on HN

Not counting GPU compute, what exactly is OpenBSD not useful for?

Personal laptop use with Ada Lovelace or Ampere family NVIDIA GPUs (did you mean this or CUDA, i couldnt tell), personal desktop use with unusual peripherals, dependency on ports, existence and competition of FreeBSD etc. I love OpenBSD's code philosophy (they were the first to introduce a lot of security techniques[1]) and the programs they produce, OpenSSH is a lifesaver, and I use doas for its low footprint on my Linux machine. Still, they have a convulated install process, dubious hardware and software compatibility that is better solved in the Linux world today.

[1]: https://www.openbsd.org/innovations.html

So pretty much only GPU compute (CUDA) and exotic peripherals?

I don't see any ports dependency issues as there's been binary packages available forever. Even the install process is a lot faster than any linux I have to use at $work, not to mention easier to automate with autoinstall[0] if needed.

[0]https://man.openbsd.org/autoinstall.8

GPU driver support is not limited to CUDA. Devices that require binary blobs of firmware to work properly are not always exotic. Some examples off the top of my head that won't work with OpenBSD hassle-free is Vantage (LLL), Solaar ... but I haven't tested. I understand you finding it easier to work with and it's faster install speeds do pique my interest, yet you being on HN already puts your technical literacy on some low % of gen pop. OpenBSD may be comparable to distros like Gentoo, Void or Arch but certainly not out-of-the-box ones like Ubuntu. They serve different auidences.

Just OpenSSH, nothing ;)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com