I do wonder if the term will make a comeback, Retrieval Augmented Generation as a concept is a fairly fundamental idea, or maybe it's considered too generic which is why tool calling is used in favour if it?

The problem with tool calling is it's too generic in my mind, maybe RAG will make a return when we get around to having different flavours of it, digging into the rich vein that is Information Retrieval

Also is it just me that doesn't like this sort of wording?

> agent has to hold

I find it very generic, I'd much prefer process or recall or any term that indicates what the agent is doing with tokens in that context