Do you have any reason to back up your claims?

See the guidelines “Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.”

Just because this story points out that one executive many years ago said something very unsavory is not a generalization for all executives.

I don't know why it's so hard to believe. It's well established that people say (and do) very nasty stuff when under stress (see: war). It's also well established that people with power tend to minimize the distress of those less powerful. Between these two, how hard is it to imagine that some mandarin at Boeing would say something like this if he thinks his bonus/summer house/childrens' private school tuition are in jeopardy?

Of course there is not zero percent chance executive said it. If you dont believe so, you never listened to what people including executives actually say in practice.

Trying to insult OP does not make an argument.