I don't quite understand -- what is it about this technique that makes the trees grow perfectly straight and why is
> the lumber produced in this method is 140% as flexible as standard cedar and 200% as dense/strong,
?
> the lumber produced in this method is 140% as flexible as standard cedar and 200% as dense/strong,
?
The strength & flexibility I would guess are attributable to the lack of knots and the straightness of the grain.
One thing both writers keep doing that's annoying is calling it a cedar. The tree is cryptomeria japonica, known as sugi, which in English is sometimes known by various misnomers such as "Japanese cedar" and "Japanese redwood," both of which should be taken as more poetic than scientific.
In fact, most trees called cedars are NOT Cedrus.
The lumber is dense/strong because the shoots have a robustness advantage due to being part of a mature tree with all its resources.