Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by stavros | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

stavros·

[flagged]

View on HN

With this proposal? There are very few things that will NOT go wrong.

I'm very pro-nuclear, but these kinds of projects are just scams.

We don’t need any new and untested technology to solve to stop spewing out greenhouse gases. We just need to scale up current green tech. It’s not know how and technology that is lacking, it is political will.

"We don't need to research any more potential solutions to this existential problem we're facing" is certainly a take.

I don't say we shouldn't do research. What I do say is that we do have all the technology we need. And more importantly, we don't have the time to wait for some future technology that potentially could solve all our problems. The climate disaster has already started (and this [0] is not "the new normal", this is just the beginning, a hint of what we should expect).

The only reason we are in this shithole is because of the lack of political will. It would have been comparable trivial to solve if we just had started 30 years ago when scientists started to yell about that it was getting urgent.

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/jun/24/europe-he...

We don't need new technology, it took France only about 20 years to replace it's coal and oil based electric generation with nuclear power generation (between 1976 and 2000).

Because of lack of political will in US and many European countries we continued to burn fuels to generate electric energy.

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profil...

Developing countries like China and India prioritized cheap coal power generation.

If by "we" you mean the whole world, then we have to do a gigantic scale up of the current green tech, as current green tech produces on minuscule part of the global primary energy.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy

Reply on news.ycombinator.com