https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2026_Iran_war#Iranian_Vic...
I think quite a lot of people calling it biased don't really understand how it works - mostly by that sort of vote amongst the kind of people who went to university so I guess left of the Republican party but not too bad.
Not sure how you'd improve it except maybe a Ground News kind of approach of having two views - right wing sources say, left wing say. But then many controversies don't neatly split left-right.
Also it's not that locked. I could edit it for example - you need to have 500 edits. And I think anyone can chip in on the "discuss" bit.
And I'm not surprised that the article is locked. If it were open to edit, there would be massive partisan re-writing of it, from all sides (Democratic, Republican, Iranian, Israeli, probably Chinese...)
Still, at least it marks it as disputed...