Amazon CEO literally told US gov officials that it could be jailbroken and is dangerous. That was a fact (or from the pov of the gov it was). If they were going to ban based on marketing, all LLMs models would have been banned by now.

This assumes that the people in charge for public policy understand the technology beyond the marketing. Which I don’t think is this case based on the track record of policymakers when it comes to essentially any technology.

Why? You can’t yell fire in a crowded place, but “this is going to destroy the world, sign up now” is okay?

Most things should be fact based, but you also should have limits to your marketing