When is she going move on from blaming her failed predecessors for their missteps & actually put an imprint of her own.
I don't know who's worse at H.P. The CEOs who effectively run the company to the ground or the board that picks them.
When is she going move on from blaming her failed predecessors for their missteps & actually put an imprint of her own.
I don't know who's worse at H.P. The CEOs who effectively run the company to the ground or the board that picks them.
She took forever to make a decision about the fate of the PSG (personal systems groups,) Agonized months over what to do with (granted, a fatally wounded) WebOs. I'm not saying she wasn't dealt a tough hand. I couldn't agree more. Her predecessors strategic blunders were atrocious, but she could have acted with more urgency.
Meg Whitman "enshrined WebOS's abandonment", "After a long tortured process", "Agonized for months".
Steve Jobs on the other hand "Within months [...] slimmed down Apple's product portfolio to a handful of products".
Is it just me, or are you describing fundamentally the exact same actions? I sense a spin doctor in the house.
I really don't have an opinion on her, but it seems like the OP of this thread was using a not very sound argument to attempt to pillory the woman.