Hacker News Reader

Comment by aucisson_masque | Hacker News Reader

Is fable that good ? I was under the impression that it's just an incremental update, and not even a big one.

Government always restricted data, tools, technology. In France for instance you're not allowed to have a gun, but policemen have.

What's the difference ?

Imo china, and deepseek will keep its open source model because they invest in long term. At some point they could do something similar, but not now.

USA government is just hurting AI development in their country, and that's good news to me.

View on HN

It's not like every French person can carry a gun, a non french nationals can not. This is a nationalism thing.

> is fable that good?

In my experience it’s not, the only difference I noticed between it and Opus was its taking much more time to respond.

Yes, easily head and shoulders above 5.5 and 4.8. The others are like pulling teeth, comparatively (in a domain that never triggers the security fallback at least).

Fable IS that good, I can tell you. At least, for physics.

For 3d engine stuff yes it's a lot better. It managed to replicate crimson deserts occlusion mapping stuff. 4.7/8 was not

For some workload, yes the difference is big

China is going to have the exact same problem, it is just lagged by x months.

If you think there is ever going to be an open source Deepseek "AGI" model I just don't think that is thinking things through.

It is the main error of the AI bubble. At some level of intelligence, the dual use nature of a model is too dangerous for a purely hands off approach.

It is like thinking at the advent of the automobile that you will be able to drive your car at any speed, without a license , any place you want.

It is inevitable and the huge sums of money being burned to build these future highly regulated public utilities probably aren't going to be happy with the returns they get from funding a highly regulated public utility.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com