> You made the claim that companies require apps because it has lower friction for ordinary users.
I did not.
> That claim is in error.
My motivation to further discuss a hallucination is insignificant.
I did not.
> That claim is in error.
My motivation to further discuss a hallucination is insignificant.
This is the exact quote:
> And at least for connected devices at home, a dedicated app can have lower friction for initial setup for the "I'm not a computer person" crowd than other alternatives do.
What good does it do you to dispute that you implied it as a justification for the status quo when your error is contained in the part you're not disputing?
> implied
Any implied meanings are your own creations, not mine.
I assure you that if I had meant something different than what I wrote, then I would have written something different instead.
I'm not shy.
Be well.