I was not talking about the output of models.
I'm referring to the model itself. The `.ckpt` file is clearly transformative wrt its training set. Or, at least, substantially more transformative than other things that have long received fair use protection.
> Like, I get that you're invested in the industry
On the contrary, I'm invested quite heavily in the exactly opposite hypothesis -- that the ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini UX you're referring to is not fit-for-purpose.
> How the heck would you train children and adolescents on the responsible use of AI?
By teaching them how it works, how it doesn't work, and to think of it as a unit of computation rather than an anthropomorphic entity.