And you'd have to balance all this against the wealth of severe X security bugs that have been coming out even just this week, and the maintenance burden of supporting it in a volunteer project with limited backing.
There's an argument that they are being too conservative. Other DEs like GNOME have already dropped X.
Then again, it's FOSS, so expectations need to match that.
Yep. I just spent a couple of hours trying to get image thumbnails back in Ubuntu. Because you know, I use that Ubuntu machine for ordinary desktop tasks that involve images.
The solution: disabling some unknown slice of security via Apparmor to get ordinary functionality. The same reason I use X11...because security experts break things that they don't have to fix.
Is Wayland more secure? I suspect so. But I want to get shit done without trying to read Arch Wiki.
I'm not sure if I misconfigured something 10 years ago and it's stuck somewhere in my home directory, or what... I can't believe nobody else is bothered by this, even if maybe not as much as I.
(ed.: I should blind test myself, but unfortunately the sessions do differ slightly, i.e. I can recognise when I'm on Wayland :/ )
(ed.2: just got new external displays, they support 120Hz, maybe that helps...)
Wayland’s “betterness” all requires technical arguments and none of Wayland’s “betterness” is apparent on the screen. Even worse Wayland’s “betterness” is only better if breaking user systems is ok.
It’s developer’s are assholes for creating all the problems you have.
the mouse pointer straight up stutters/stops when the system is under some kind of load… like, say, starting firefox. Not sure if it's CPU load or GPU load but it's a pretty low threshold somewhere. Maybe firefox starting is blocking some screen drawing thing?
Anyway I'm logging out and back into X11 before I punch my screen on impulse.
I personally find colour management to work better than x11 lately, but that might not be for everyone.