Having met people in my life, an AI is better than most of them by any objective measure IMO.
Having met people in my life, an AI is better than most of them by any objective measure IMO.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
AI is the perfect product for that third group.However I disagree in that I don't want to "talk to AI" either. Any time anyone sends me AI output, I simply reply that I can prompt GPT myself, if I want; just send me the inputs.
I didn't quite get this, you ask them to send you their prompt? Does this disincentivize them from sending AI responses in the future?
P.S. I always found it ironic that this quote does the very thing it classifies as small-minded - discusses people :)
Their prompt: "write a polite and friendly email message to turn down an invitation because I already have plans at that time."
What I want them to send me: "thank you but I already have plans"
I don't want 2-paragraphs of milquetoast slop.
P.S. Ideas can involve people.
Heh. It's a believable taxonomy, but it makes me suspect it could often have the corollary:
Small minds create work; average minds do work; great minds talk about work.In my experience their prompt is usually a verbatim copy-paste of the message I sent them, personal info and all. They simply put zero thought in it.