Which is more likely: CNN commits murder to increase viewership; or any one of billions of people commits murder to win a bet?
Funny how people take journalists as some sort of most moral form of human being. Meanwhile they are most likely to take bribes for editorializing, silencing, ads or completely making up stories. All while they are most likely to get earliest information on markets ergo most likely to rig markets themselves.
You've been so busy straw manning with the ridiculous and unstated claim that journalists are the "most moral form of human being" that you have conspicuously failed to answer my question.
Taking bets, long odds on CNN committing murder
I'm against state intervention on the internet of all kinds, including banning these sorts of sites but...
Yes, of course CNN is evil. Is this still even a matter of debate?