All dependency management is speculative. You've got to hedge your bets that the dependency is reliable and fit for purpose. It is reasonable to view Bun's recent choices as increasing the risk associated with depending on it.
That is to say, techno jesus cometh.
What a nonsense generalization.
In this case, the speculation ostensibly is that in future, there will be a release version of Bun that has is buggier or otherwise lower quality than the current stable version.
There's literally no basis for believing that. The actual basis is "I don't like how they're approaching the development of their next version."
If that's a valid basis for "dependency management", then using a Ouija board would be just as valid.
a million-line rewrite over 7-8 days
The PR that was merged.