There should be some warning if some "fact" is only supported by one or very few obscure sources.
The strength of the sources should be clearly indicated in the answers to help users gauge how trustworthy the info is.
The strength of the sources should be clearly indicated in the answers to help users gauge how trustworthy the info is.
LLMs are very good at this clearly
I guess there’ll be some guy at google going through every blog and saying whether it’s reliable or not?
Everything old is new again when you start a new market. If you think that AI is bad imagine what old tricks are new with polymarkets