I despise armchair libertarians and Substack "intellectualism" as much as the next guy, but your comment doesn't offer any pushback to the claim being made.
I don't engage with the "firehose of falsehood" types of articles as it's a losing battle. This guy's is a high school teacher whose side-gig is churning out pro-AI content for validation.
I simply disregard the entire article since I know the author's MO, and I inform other HN members of it.
So basically you're asking everyone to just trust you, a random commentator that provides no evidence or sourcing, over an article written with extensive sourcing, details, and explanations?
You might be the correct person here, but you're not going to convince anyone like this.