Hacker News Reader

In my experience, what you call vision-based systems don't even come close to Gyroflow. After I started using Gyroflow I haven't touched the Ronin gimbal many times.

View on HN

A physical stabilizer like the Ronin is not what they mean. They mean vision based approaches which should be more accurate.

It doesn’t seem obvious that vision based stabilisation would be more accurate than a high accuracy gyroscope of the actual motion.

At any rate if gyroflow obsoletes an actual gimbal it’s pretty close to perfect.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com