While their comment is abbrasive, that's a lot of assumptions about OP. Do you really know what their information source is?
The core point remains valid, you could've just skipped the play on "alt-man" and you wouldn't have muddied your argument.
The core point remains valid, you could've just skipped the play on "alt-man" and you wouldn't have muddied your argument.
Pointing things out that I find interesting to potential readers of my comment, doesn't necessarily muddle my argument. If I had said that alternate man was the origin of his last name, you or the other commenters might have a valid point, but I never did that.
If someone is going to make broad assumptions about me and resort to infantile name calling in an attempt to demean me, I have no problem making broad assumptions about them in turn.
If the UN is actively being advised by self-described Luciferians / theosophists, do you think it's impossible that there are other Luciferians in powerful positions around the world? It's definitely possible and not only is it possible, it's the truth, whether you want to admit it or not. Clearly you don't read what these people write, or know the history and associations of the people you talk about. You're a know-it-all that knows nothing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucis_Trust
https://www.lucistrust.org/about_us/support_un
https://www.theblaze.com/return/what-the-un-isnt-telling-us-...