As far as Trump goes, yes, he's implicated all over the files. A simple search on any search engine will find plenty of examples for you.
Instead… The entire DNC spent a billion and a half on an election just on 2024 to lose historically. Lawfare. States trying to remove Trump from the ballots… all the had to do was release even one incriminating file.
You must have seen files I haven’t. Please link to a file that implicates Trump in wrong doing.
... Right, and I was addressing why that was the case. That's the discussion that was being had here. Seriously, are you aware of the comment chain you're commenting in?
>You must have seen files I haven’t. Please link to a file that implicates Trump in wrong doing.
Did you actually search at all? This was incredibly easy to find, and there are plenty more: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g0dzg6e4mo
It's why the Democrats keep only pushing social issues, they are captured and cannot make any radical change without losing the support of their wealthy donors.
Another way to look at it, consider that every coup that occurred in South America was done extra-legally to protect American corporate/monetary interests.
Anyone who’s guilty of that either has sufficient corrupt clout to have eliminated the evidence of their crimes (thus no “files” threaten them), or, are already known about.
And come on, with the guy at the top of the government being very likely one of them and very openly and obviously corrupt, it is more of a stretch for me to believe that “Epstein permanent deletion service” isn’t an item on his main bribe menu.
Consider: if Kamala ended up on the files, would any liberals vote for Trump?
But, for a random wealthy donor it’d be rather inconvenient to be in the files and they’ll pay for not being included in the releases.
And: a sponsor? Think: most sponsors, and the establishment politicians.