The credit for DeepSeek, in part, goes to US companies such as OpenAI [1] and DeepSeek [2]. Portions of DeepSeek are based on their products.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/world/china/openai-accuses-deepseek-...
[1] https://www.reuters.com/world/china/openai-accuses-deepseek-...
It's morally right to fuck over Anthropic (and OpenAI, or any other lab). Works generated by AI are not copyrightable anyways, and their terms of service have zero legal value.
It’s certain all the labs use each others APIs extensively for testing - what’s the actual evidence that Deepseek was at significantly higher scale etc.?