Those two things are in fact different. Does requiring a VIN on a car mean that cars are banned?
Some states seem to have designated even private roads as “public” if there is uncontrolled access (seems ripe for a court challenge though). But offroading or gated roads would be fine even here.
Some YouTubers have fun importing cheap Chinese cars that aren’t street legal and destroying them with extreme offroading.
Somehow I doubt that many 2nd amendment supporters would be okay with "You don't need a registration number on your gun, it'll just be illegal to carry/use it anywhere except private property"
The biggest problem with this (for the first group) would be conveyance from buyer to seller or to/from a range or hunting grounds.
https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/dep350/receive...
Only a few states absolutely forbid operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (I know Washington is one). That said, you’d have to do something pretty absurd to attract the attention of law enforcement if you’re staying on your own land.
That's just BS. If the cops show up for any reason and they think they can get a DUI out of it they will try and write one.
Of course, Chinese cars in the US are effectively banned by regulations. Proof that VIN can be used for banning.
Per the statute text, you may not manufacture a firearm for personal use in Colorado: the statute requires an FFL's license number (which you do not have) to be placed in the serial number string.
FFLs didn't exist in 1790 - therefore this fails Bruen among other standards.