[flagged]
Yes but that's an uncomfortable framing for online-americans to use when they want some gotcha argument
And not a useful one for US administrations in the last 30 years (trump was far from the first one) to make because the (mostly) unstated assumption was that the vast majority of increased spending would go to american manufacturers to prop up american jobs
Frankly, it doesn't pass the sniff test and its bizarre to see some (educated!) American HN readers falling for it.
You don't need to add this, just say that you agree with him on that point. If the mob comes down on you for agreeing with the devil you can counter that you agree with facts, not based on who happens to voice them.