Honestly, if you wanted to make a YC company today that targets AI in a meaningdful way, I'd say make it focused on cyber security analysis. ;)
Honestly, if you wanted to make a YC company today that targets AI in a meaningdful way, I'd say make it focused on cyber security analysis. ;)
But we've had the shock headlines already, and nothing changes. We've seen hospitals get hit that had real-life consequences for patients, the entirety of US citizens SSNs have been breached multiple times now. Passwords as a concept are basically obsolete now. There's even more.
That bomb has already been going off.
If anything I'm seeing the opposite. Companies are throwing security to the wind to go all in on AgEnTiC AI.
If we want change irt cybersecurity, then there needs to start being real consequences for a breach. Not just free credit monitoring. The companies that are proven to be negligent should face actual financial & criminal consequences.
Also, in my niche (hardware and embedded product security), AI doesn't a have a functional impact to the work except in code analysis, but even that is difficult given the level of abstraction these systems are built at.
So the issue is two-fold:
* The knowledge must be documented and accessible for training.
* A bespoke model must be trained this documentation.
It is unlikely that both of these things happen in the general model context. Perhaps individual chip vendors will eventually pursue this, but I suspect it is just not a priority for them.