Hacker News Reader

Comment by mebkorea | Hacker News Reader

Cheers, appreciate the feedback. The architect/consultant precedent angle is interesting and a couple of other commenters have already nudged me in similar directions. Tbh... you're likely right that the strongest commercial play isn't B2C £19 reports, it's giving someone fighting a contested case the national pattern across 15 similar pub conversions, the appeal outcomes, what stuck and what didn't. That's a very different product to what I have now but the data supports it. On the T&Cs/legal stuff... I'm not going to pretend I have perfect clarity on it. The position I'd defend is that the data is statutorily public, councils are required by law to publish it, I respect rate limits, and I'm aggregating not republishing in bulk. But there is this grey area between data being public to view and being usable for a commercial product, and I haven't fully nailed it down.

View on HN

I would say that you should consider checking whether the councils and/or these planning portals operate under an Open Government Licence : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Government_Licence . These in theory permit commercial use.

I would also see that there is a strong case to say that it is aggregation. Something that would help is redirecting users to the original source content whenever you are referencing it within your search.

I agree on the “public” data issue - I spent a long time campaigning for better FOSS / data access in government and there are some great people pushing in and outside local and central gov.

But it’s a big mindset chnage (one that will benefit the whole country) but it’s slow.

I think the “push for public policy improvements” angle if genuine will get you a lot more respect and kudos when things get sticky. Good luck

Cheers, and things get sticky isn't lost on me, especially after some of the feedback. Seems all the feedback is converging on the same direction namely open-source the data layer, lead with public-interest, let any commercial product sit on top rather than be the thing. Haven't fully thought it through but maybe this is where it should go. Appreciate the gov-data campaigning context too.

Yes … but…

No-one has figured out how to make money off open source (while sticking to the basic principles. Jeff Bezos makes a fortune off of it)

Most people who open source their code that I have known and still wanted to be paid / recognised for their effort have always been disappointed

Can I suggest you mentally put the work you have done to date into a box marked “the past”, open the data, start yourself as part of the community trying to make government code and data open, and sell your skills - the old “consultancy paying the bills” approach

Trying to make cash off public data will just confuse the message, and start to build resentment. Make a clean and clear statement, Sell your services on top. Expand to other forms of data scraping in government.

It’s a tough road - good luck

Thanks! Yup,... the freemium + paid analysis route is the obvious next step from where I am. You're right that my commercial intent is muddying the message. The sell skills, not data/ consultancy angle isn't one I'd seriously considered. Sounds pretty good, need to sit with it.

A few weeks ago, I'd have said the SaaS product is the play, but now I'm not so sure. Cheers for taking the time.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com