Hacker News Reader

Solving open math problems is strong evidence of intelligence so there's not really any need for rationalization? I don't understand why intelligence would require intent or motive? Isn't intent just the behaviour of making a specific thing happen rather than other things?

View on HN

I'm curious, do you think that this also applies to stable diffusion? Are these models "creative" too?

I haven't used stable diffusion enough to have a strong opinion on it. But my thinking is LLMs have only recently started contributing novel solutions to problems, so maybe there is some threshold above which there's less sloppy remixing of training data and more ability to form novel insights, and image generators haven't crossed this line yet.

Yeah? Those models are creative.

The LLM did not solve the problem.

Who did then?

The student and his colleague did.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com