Hacker News Reader

Code changes are cheaper to make now and kind of more expensive to verify.

So you can still contribute, you just not need to provide the code, just the issue.

Which isn't as bad as it sounds, it kind of feels bad to rewrite somebody's code right away when it is theoretically correct, but opinionated codebases seem to work very well if the maintainer opinions are sane.

View on HN

And if the maintainer doesn't understand something about how the exploit works? Also, code changes aren't cheaper, its just that you can watch YouTube instead of putting in effort now. But time still passes and that costs the same. Reviewing the code is far more expensive now though since the LLM won't use libraries.

PS The economics of software haven't really changed, its just that people (executives) wish they have changed. They misunderstood the economics of software before LLMs and they misunderstand the economics of software now.

PPS The only people that LLMs benefit are the segment of devs who are lazy.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com