Hacker News Reader

Gotta be honest, I have. I'm still living in a world where AMD is superior, but that may not be the case today?

For laptops Lunar lake and Panther lake addressed many issues and brought x86 power consumption to Apple Silicon levels.

Is that true? Many other comments in this thread are saying Apple Silicon has something like 30% better efficiency/battery life.

Apple Silicon had a process node advantage over the Core 100 and 200 series due to having a better allocation with TSMC.

Now Intel's process node is also SOTA and on par with TSMC 2nm so they should be more or less equivalent and the only differences down to what set of compromises they make in the design of the chips.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com