Just read the article again and I'd suggest also reading responses we sent to fact checkers (many answers didn't even show up in the article). James' side of the story is riddled with lies. So, if you read the article with that in mind, you can see that Copperhead got steered in the wrong direction by James. Daniel has been the owner of the open source project from the beginning and Copperhead was never in control of it. It was right to move forward without James. Nothing paranoid about that. It's more a move by someone who is dedicated to doing things right.

See the attacks on GrapheneOS and even other privacy projects trying to make them look like they are designed for criminals. Even French law enforcement took part. We have shared these details publicly and even with links to articles with quotes. There was even news about authorities in Spain assuming anyone with a Pixel was likely a criminal.

Months ago, we saw tons of reports of organizations reporting hacking GrapheneOS without any evidence or links to court cases. We never claim that GrapheneOS isn't hackable, but we still haven't seen any credible evidence showing forensics companies were able to hack it.

These are just a few examples of how GrapheneOS is being attacked. Again, we're not the only ones.

It's also important to note that GrapheneOS has many project members. GrapheneOS isn't a one man show.

Our responses to these things are not out of paranoia. We want our users to know what's going on, so we keep them informed. What's wrong with that?

I spent several minutes [1] looking into it earlier today because I'd mostly ignored it in the past, but his claims appear completely valid, and if anything, stop short of painting a sufficient picture of how badly he's harassed. I won't link to any of it here, but it took me one query and reading one page worth of it to think Micay is the most reasonable actor in the story. (Yes, I read more thereafter.)

When you have years-long public forum dox threads dedicated to doxing you with people openly calling for your physical harm, all with some non-zero degree of complicity and/or support by a YouTuber with millions of subscribers, let us know if it still seems like paranoia to you.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47868159

I'm sure it's exhausting producing an awesome product, only to get crapped on by governments and corporations that hate privacy and drama-farming Twitter randos, but debunking bad-faith bullshit is nothing if not rational in a world where reputation matters.

The claim anyone on the GrapheneOS team is paranoid is unsubstantiated.