Comment by aphyr | Hacker News Reader

Comment by aphyr | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

It's been weirdly uneven. Sections 1, 3, and 5 did well on HN; 2, 4, and 6 sank with essentially no trace. The distribution of views is presently:

1. Introduction: 33,088 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689648)

2. Dynamics: 3,659 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693678)

3. Culture: 5,914 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703528)

4. Information Ecology: 777 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718502)

5. Annoyances: 7,020 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730981)

6. Psychological Hazards: 199 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747936)

Feedback from early readers was that the work was too large to digest in a single reading, so I split it up into a series of posts. I'm not entirely sure this was the right call; the sections I thought were the most interesting seem to have gotten much less attention than the introductory preliminaries.

I think these articles may benefit from a more thorough table of content at the beginning, or from some kind of abstract. If you briefly presented the whole list of topics in a single article, it would be more clear that your views on the topic are more complete. I initially thought the table of content would be scoped to the article itself rather than connecting it to the adjacent ones.

I had never heard of you, and this article appeared very biased to me. I found the information ecology piece superior, shame that it went unnoticed; I will try to go through all of them. I admire the breadth of topics you’re covering and appreciate the many sources. They’re clearly written in your own voice and that is great to see, I guess I mostly reacted to not being fully aligned with your view.

I'm not sure that HN vote count is a good indicator of interest? HN alerted me to the existence of the intro post. I read the intro, noticed that it was one in an ongoing series, and have been checking your blog for new installments every few days.

I suspect that if you'd not broken up the post into a series of smaller ones, the sorts of folks who are unwilling to read the whole thing as you post it section by section would have fed the entire post to an LLM to "summarize".

Reply on news.ycombinator.com