This is moral relativism at its finest, and just plain wrong. I'm not willing to go so far as to call Anthropic a
good player, but they are surprisingly often willing to put their money where their mouth is. Obviously everything can be
interpreted as a PR move as well, but we just lack context to know true intentions. Personally I have repeatedly
sold being a good org as a PR move, it is the easiest way to do good in a capitalist environment. The success of such a sales pitch significantly relies on the moral values (or lack thereof) of the other decision makers at the company.
With Project Glasswing for example, I'm impressed at how generally well thought out it is, and very much appreciate that they donate a lot of money to OSS. I would have liked them to extend the Project to smaller players as well, but power centralisation is an inherent problem of AI, not something that is unique to Anthropic.