The article spells RISC-V incorrectly as "Risk V" in some sentences.
This does not feel like the sort of error somebody going so far as to implement this would make.
Gut feeling is not good. Unfortunate.
This does not feel like the sort of error somebody going so far as to implement this would make.
Gut feeling is not good. Unfortunate.
e.g. I'd love to see cycles spent in each mode (machine/supervisor/user). Also how much idle (wfi).
In the graph, does it show the highest level of execution within the sample interval, or the current one at sample time?